In a recent interview, veteran actor Annu Kapoor has sparked a debate by challenging the notion that Shah Rukh Khan is the 'last superstar'. Kapoor's comments come in the wake of Khan's now-famous statement made during Anupam Kher's talk show in 2014, where he claimed to be the 'last of the stars'.
Kapoor, known for his straight-talking nature, believes that the media's obsession with creating a 'last superstar' narrative is misleading. He draws a parallel to the era of Rajesh Khanna, suggesting that no actor has come close to matching the longevity and impact of Amitabh Bachchan, Lata Mangeshkar, and Asha Bhosle. Kapoor questions the sustainability of a 34-year-long career, implying that it's becoming increasingly difficult for any actor to maintain such longevity.
What makes Kapoor's perspective particularly intriguing is his own experience with Khan. Despite working together in Yash Chopra's 1993 thriller 'Darr', Kapoor claims, 'I don’t even remember working with him'. This lack of personal connection adds weight to his argument, as he emphasizes the transient nature of stardom.
Kapoor's comments echo those of actor Vivek Oberoi, who previously questioned the permanence of stardom. Oberoi's comparison of current stars to historical figures like Raj Kapoor highlights the fleeting nature of fame. He posits that in the future, people might wonder who Shah Rukh Khan is, just as they might not know about Raj Kapoor today.
Kapoor's critique of the 'last superstar' label is a reminder that the entertainment industry is constantly evolving. While stars may rise and fall, the legacy of those who care for their family and contribute to the industry's growth is what truly endures. Kapoor's perspective invites a broader discussion on the nature of stardom and the factors that contribute to an actor's long-term relevance.
